SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

P.D.DESAI, B.S.THAKUR
Kamla Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent


Miss Kamlesh Sharma, Advocate - For the Petitioner.
P.N. Nag, Rakesh Verma, Advocates - For the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

P.D. Desai, C.J.-Yesterday we passed an order all owing the petition but the judgment could not be delivered for want of time. We proceed to do so now.

The Factual Matrix:

2. The petitioner is the wife of the second respondent (hereinafter referred to as "the respondent"). The parties were married in the month of February, 1980. After the marriage, the respondent has been living with the petitioner in a house constructed by her parents. Two sons (twins) were born out of the wedlock in the month of May, 1981. The petitioner alleges that the respondent, who is a habitual drunkard, has been maltreating her since 1982. Frequent quarrels and cruel beatings have almost become a daily routine.

3. According to the petitioner, the respondent returned home at about 9 P.M. on July 12, 1986. He was under the influence of liquor. He asked for the custody of the children since he wanted to go away with them. When the petitioner refused to, oblige, he tried to forcibly snatch away the children. The petitioner thereupon raised au alarm and the respondent went away. On July 13, 1986 at about 9.30 A.M. the respondent once again tried to take away the children along with the belongings. The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top