SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

A.N.DIKSHITA
Khalil Ahmed – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
K. G. Srivastava, Advocate - For the Appellant.
A.G.A. - For the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

A.N. Dikshita, J. - This appeal arises out of the judgment and order dated 24.8.1977 passed by the 1st Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bareilly, in S.T. No. 181 of 1975 convicting the appellant under section 324 I.P.C. and sentencing him to a fine of Rs. 500/-and in default of payment of fine to undergo six months R.I.

2. Briefly stated, the appellant Khalil was charged under section 307 I.P.C. while another co-accused Sarwar Ali was charged under section 307 read with section 34 I.P.C. for inflicting knife injuries to one Israr Ali on the night between 10th/11th April 1974. The 1st Additional District and Sessions Judge vide the impugned order dated 24.8.1977 found the appellant not guilty under section 307 I.P.C. but convicted him under section 324 I.P.C. and sentenced him to the period already undergone and a fine of Rs. 500/-. Similarly, co-accused Sarwar Ali was found not guilty under section 307/34 I.P.C. but was convicted under section 352/34 I.P.C. and was sentenced to the period already undergone.

3. The instant appeal was admitted by this Court on 30.8.1977 and the realization of fine from the appellant was stayed. However, before the appeal could come up

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top