SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.BHASKARAN, LAKSHMI NARAYANA REDDY, SRIRAMULU
Kalavathi – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
B. Subhashan Reddy, Advocate - For the Petitioner.
Advocate General - For the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

K. Bhaskaran, C.J. - This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution is by one Smt. Kalavathi for the issue of a writ of Habeas Corpus for setting at liberty her husband, Shivasari Gangadhar (hereinafter referred to as 'the detenu') who is undergoing detention pursuant to the order dated 6-6-1986 passed under Section 3 of the Prevention of Blackmarketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980, by the second respondent, the District Magistrate (District Collector), Adilabad. The gravemen of the charge against the detenu is that he is the registered owner of lorry bearing No. A.T.J. 3041, and that he had been transporting paddy from Adilabad district in this State to Dharmabad District in Maharashtra State by making use of that lorry, without any permit in that behalf which he amounted to violation of clause 3 of the A.P. Paddy (Restriction on Movement) Order read with Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. In the operative portion of the grounds it is stated as follows;

"You, thus contravened the provisions of (a) Cl. 3 of A.P. Paddy (Restriction on Movement) Order, 1983, (b) Cl. 7 of A.P. Rice Procurement (Levy) Order 1984 r/w. S

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top