SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

M.K.CHAWLA
S. Mohinder Singh Saluja – Appellant
Versus
Vanson Shoes – Respondent


K.K. Sud with Rajiv Chaudan, Advocates - For the Petitioner.
M.R. Chawla, Advocate - For the Respondent

JUDGMENT

M.K. Chawla, J. - The petitioner, S. Mohinder Singh Saluja is the owner/landlord of the property No. 6/6 W.E.A. Karol Bagh, New Delhi. M/S Vanson Shoes, a registered partnership firm, to start with, was the tenant of the part of the ground floor of the said premises but in the year 1971, they became the tenant of the whole of the ground floor, including the mezzanine floor at a consolidated rent of Rs. 435/- per mensem. Subsequently the rent was increased to Rs. 515/- including the water charges. The rent has since been paid to the landlord till the filing of the present complaint under section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

2. The case set up by the tenant in brief is that at the time of the creation of the tenancy, it was agreed between the parties that the respondent landlord will carry out the white wash and minor repairs of the tenancy premises. In spite of the repeated requests and reminders, the landlord failed to get the premises in good shape as per the terms of the rent note. Aggrieved from the behaviour of the landlord, the tenants got a notice dated. 15.7.83 served on him through their counsel. In reply dated 21.10.83, the landlord while denying the ave

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top