SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

A.P.SEN, V.BALAKRISHNA ERADI
Tota Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Balakrishna Eradi, J.- After hearing Shri A.N. Mulla, Sr. Advocate for appellants and Shri R.S. Sodhi, Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent and having carefully examined all aspects of the case in the light of the submissions made at the Bar, we have unhesitatingly come to the conclusion that this appeal has to be allowed.

2. The four appellants before us-Tota, Singh, Dauli Singh, Mithu Singh, and Mukhtiar Singh were tried by the. Court of Sessions, Faridkot on charges under Section 302 I.P.C. read with Section 34 I.P.C. and Section 323 I.P.C. read with Section 34 I.P.C. After detailed consideration of the entire evidence adduced in the case, the learned Sessions Judge by his judgment dated May 30, 1974 acquitted the appellants of all the charges laid against them. Against the said decision of the Sessions Judge, the State of Punjab preferred Criminal Appeal No, 1106 of 1974 in the High Court of Punjab and Haryana. A Division Bench of the High Court by its judgment dated April 9,1978 allowed the State's appeal, set aside the order of the Sessions Judge acquitting the appellants convicted the appellants under Section 302 I.P.C. read with Section 34 I.P.C. as well a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top