SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.PADMANABHAN
Not Found – Appellant
Versus
Not Found – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S. Padmanabhan, J.- As many as 14 cases popularly known as 'Mark list Cases' were charge sheeted, before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Trivandrum, prior to the establishment of the Special Court. At a time when those cases were pending investigation, the investigating officer, in one of the cases (Crime No. 284/CR/80 filed a report M.P. 3656 of 1982 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Trivandrum, under section 306 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to tender pardon to one Anandan who was one of the accused in the cases, and to record his statement. The offences are not exclusively triable by the Court of Session. By order dated 26.11.1982 the then Chief Judicial Magistrate Mr. Sadasivan turned down the prayer. He doubted his power to grant the prayer and went on to consider how he was to proceed after tendering pardon and recording the statement.

2. The order was challenged by the State in Crl. R.P. 136 of 1982 before the Sessions Judge, Trivandrum. The Sessions Judge allowed the revision and directed the Chief Judicial Magistrate to accept the report of the investigating officer and proceed according to law. It was also provided in the order that when the Chief Judicial

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top