SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

V.P.MATHUR
Ram Pratap Singh – Appellant
Versus
Amar Nath Singh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

V. P. Mathur, J. - This revision is directed against the judgment and order dated 26.9.1983 passed by Mr. R.K. Gupta, the then XIth Additional Sessions Judge, Allahabad. The learned Judge affirmed the conviction of the applicant on a charge under section 471 of the I.P.C. and also confirmed the order placing the applicant on probation for a period of one year and to execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 1000/- and furnish two sureties in the like amount and keep good behaviour for a period of one year. This order was passed in Criminal Appeal No. 113 of 1983 and the judgment and order of the Magistrate were passed in Criminal Case No. 368 of 1978.

2. Very brief point is involved. The allegations of Amar Nath Singh complainant were that some of his fields were acquired by the government for establishment of a factory in the name of Indian Telephone Industry. At the time of the taking over of the land, the Government had directed that persons whose land was being acquired would be given service in the factory. On enquiry, the complainant learnt that some body else of the name of Ram Pratap Singh who is the present revisionist, has been given service in his place on the ba

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top