SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

P.K.SETHURAMAN
Prasanna Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Dhanalaxmi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

P K. Sethuraman. J. - This petition coming on for hearing upon perusing the petition and 'upon hearing the arguments of Mr. K. Shanmugahani, Advocate or, the petitioner and of Mr. S.I. Jagadev, Advocate for the 1st Respondent and the notice sent to Respondents 2 to 6 not having been' returned, either served or un-served, the Court made the following order: The petitioner is the first accused in C.C. No. 13217 of 1987 on the file of the X Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore;' Madras. This is a petition praying to call for the records in C.C. No. 13217 of 1987 on the file of the X Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Madras, and to quash said proceedings.

2. According to the, petition the first respondent Dhanalaxmi has filed the complaint against the petitioner and five others for offences under Sections 494, 496, and 498-A I.P.C. alleging that she had married the petitioner at Thanjavur on 20-4-1979; and there are two issues-a girl aged about 9 years and above aged about 5 years, and that she. Jived with the petitioner until the year 1982 - and their last residence was at No. 54, Vellala Street, Ayyanavaram Madras, and, she was finally deserted in 'March, 1983. Further, according

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top