SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

A.C.SENGUPTA, PADMA KHASTGIR
Indian Die C. C. P. Ltd – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


JUDGMENT

A.C. Sengupta, J. In this revisional application the accused petitioners being the Company and its Directors pray for quashing the proceeding of the Case No. Cj307 of 1982 filed on 1-2-82 by the respondent No.2 the Assistant Registrar of Companies against the petitioners under Section 220(3) read with Section 162(1) of the Companies Act, 1956 and the order passed in that case by the learned Magistrate taking cognizance and issuing summons against the petitioners. The respondent No. 2 filed that case on the allegations that the Annual General Meeting of the Company should have been held on 30-10-79 and the balance sheet and profit and loss account of the Company for the year ending 30-4-1979 was required to be filed under Section 220(1) of the Companies Act, 1956 in the office of the complainant on or before 30-10-1979 and that the said officers of the company having not filed the said balance sheet and profit. and loss account were liable to be punished under Section 220(3) read with Section 1620) of the Companies Act, 1956 thereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). In the said case the complainant also prayed for giving direction to the accused officers of the Company under

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top