SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.L.SRIVASTAVA
Tarachand – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

K. L. Shrivastava, J. - This revision petition is against the order dated 5.3.1983 passed by the Sessions Judge, Indore in Criminal Case No. 80 of 1984 whereby it has been directed that charge under section 7(I)(a)(ii) read with section 3(2)(i) of the Essential Commodities Act" 1955 (for short 'the Act') for not exhibiting the price list of oil as defined in Clause 2(c) of the M.P. Motor Spirit and High Speed Diesel Oil (Licensing and Control) Order, 1980 (for short 'the Order') containing opening balance and the price, has to be framed.

2. Circumstances giving rise to this revision petition are these. The petitioner Tara Chand holds licence for sale of oil which according to the definition means motor spirit and high speed diesel oil. He runs his business under the name and style of 'United Allto Service, Rall' district Indore. The other petitioner Yusufali is the salesman employed by him. On 3.5.1982, the Assistant Food Officer Indore, on inspection found that (1) stock register was not filled after 1.5.82 (2) no sale register was "maintained, (3) on meter reading 34 litres of diesel was found in excess and (4) bills were issued on 3.5.82 for adjustment of the stock.

3.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top