SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

P.K.SETHURAMAN
K. G. Gangadharan – Appellant
Versus
T. R. Parvathi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

P.K. Seethuraman, J. - This is a petition under Sec. 482 of Crl. PC, praying to call for the records in MC No. 38 of 1985 on the file of the Sub Division Judicial Magistrate, Sankari and to quash the proceedings.

2. The petitioner is the respondent (husband) in MC No. 38 of 1985 on the file of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sankari and the respondent herein is the wife of the petitioner and she has filed the aforesaid MC No. 38 of 1985 claiming maintenance under Section 125 of Crl. PC.

3. The petitioner has come forward stating that the marriage took place on 10th October, 1983 between himself and the respondent and after the marriage, he went to Bangalore, stayed there for three or four days and returned to Ca1cutta on or about 30th October, 1983. They lived together for a month or two with the petitioner's father at No. 9-B, Pandapukar Road, Lajpatraj K Sarain, Calcutta. Thereafter the respondent left the matrimonial home and was staying with her parents. She was having serious ailments and she could not comply with the matrimonial obligations. He filed a petition for dissolution of the marriage on that ground as well as on other grounds in matrimonial Suit No.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top