GUJARAT HIGH COURT
M. B Shah, J.
Alok Badridas Agrawal-Petitioner
versus
State of Gujarat and another -Respondents
Misc. Crl. Application No. 114 of 1988
Decided on 16-6-1988
M.R. Barot, Advocate - For the Petitioner.
K.L. Abhichandani, Advocate and M.D. Pandya, Public Prosecutor-For the Respondents.
Held, section 53(1) empowers the Central Government after consulation with the State Government to invest any officer of the departmental of central excise, narcotics, customs, revenue intelligence or Border Security Force pr any class of such officers with the powers of an officer-in-charge of a police station for purposes of investigating the offences under the Act. Same is the position with sub-section (2), which empowers the State Government to invest any officer of the department of drugs control, revenue or excise or any class of such officers with the similar power. But this section nowhere provides that the said officer shall be deemed to be an officer-in-charge of a police station or that he shall be considered to be an officer-in-charge of a police station for the purposes of this Act. Under the Criminal Procedure Code a police officer can submit a charge-sheet under section 173 of the Criminal Procedure Code or his report under section 169 of the Code. All that section 53 provides is that for the purpose of his inquiry the officer empowered under section 53 shall have the powers of an officer-in-charge of police station at the time of investigating the offences under this Act. Section 37 of the Act provides that every offence punishable under this Act is a cognizable offence. Therefore, the officer empowered under section 53 shall have all the powers of an officer-in-charge of a police station investigating a cognizable case. But these powers are only limited for the purpose of investigation and it does not include the power of filing charge-sheet under section 173 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Further, customs officers or other officers who investigate the offence under the Act are not police officers. (Para 3)
Further held, these powers are conferred upon the officers with a limited object of detection and prevention of crime under the Narcotics Act. Different powers are given to different officers but that does not mean that all these officers are police officers or are deemed to be police station officers. Only limited powers which are necessary and incidental to prevent and detect the crime under the Act are given to these officers. Unlike a police officer who has the general power under the Code: to investigate all cognizable cases, the power of an officer under the Act is restricted to the offences under the Act and that too only for the purpose of investigation. They have no power to submit the report to a Magistrate under section 190 of the Criminal Procedure Code with a view that the cognizance of an offence be taken by a Magistrate. They have to file a complaint under clause (1) of section 194 to Magistrate to enable him to take cognizance of an offence committed under Act. (Para 16)
Result :
Application rejected.
JUDGMENT
M.B. Shah, J.-The only question which requires determination in this revision application is whether the Superintendent, Central Excise, who has investigated the case is required to file complaint or submit charge-sheet before the Magistrate for the offences alleged to have been committed by the petitioner' accused under the provisions of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, hereinafter referred to as "the Act"
2. Learned counsel Mr. Barot submitted that under section 53 of the Act the powers of an officer-in-charge of a police station for investigation of the offences under the Act are given to the Central Excise Officers, the customs officers and other officers Therefore, respondent No. 1 is required to submit charge-sheet after completion of the investigation and he cannot file private complaint before the learned Magistrate. For emphasizing his submission, he submitted that under different provisions of the Act different types of powers are conferred upon the officers or other persons mentioned therein, The learned counsel heavily relied upon section 53 which empowers the Central Government or the State Government to invest any officer mentioned therein with the powers of an officer-in-charge of a public station for the investigation of the offences under the Act and he submitted that the said officer for all purposes is an officer-in-charge of a police station for investigation or is a police officer for the purposes of this Act and hence he has to file report or charge-sheet as provided under section 169 or 174 of the Criminal Procedure Code and he cannot file the private criminal complaint. He also referred to section 41(1) of the Act which empowers the Magistrate to issue warrant for arrest or search warrant as provided in the section. Under sub-section (2) of section 41 the officer of a gazetted rank as mentioned therein is entitled to authorised any officer subordinate to him but superior in rank to peon, sepoy or a constable to arrest or search a building, conveyance or place. Section 42 empowers certain officers or persons being officers superior in rank to a peon, sepoy or constable to enter into, search any building, conveyance or place, seize, tender and arrest any person whom he has reason to believe to have committed any offence punishable under Chapter IV relating to any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance. He also referred to section 52 sub-section (3) wherein it is provided that every person arrested and article seized under sub-section (2) of section 41, section 42, section 43 or section 44 shall be forwarded without unnecessary delay to (a) the officer-in-charge of the nearest police station, or
(b) the officer empowered under section 53. It is his contention that the officer-in-charge of the nearest police station and the officer empowered under section 53 are having same powers and, therefore, they are required to follow the same procedure. He, therefore, submitted that as officer-in-charge of the nearest police station is required to submit report either under section 169 or section 174 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the officer empowered under section 53 also should follow the same procedure.
3. For deciding this question, if we refer to section 53 of the Act it is abundantly clear that the powers which are conferred on any officer as specified in section 53(1) or (2) are the powers for the investigation of the offences under the Act but he is not an officer-in-charge of a police station or he is not deemed to be an officer-in-charge of a police station. Section 53 of the Act reads as under:
"53. (1) The Central Government, after consultation with the State Government, may, by notification published in the Official Gazette, invest any officer of the department of central excise, narcotics, customs, revenue intelligence or Border Security Force or any class of such officers with the powers of an officer-in charge of a police station for the investigation of the offenc
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.