SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

A.D.TATED
Madhuri Mukund Chitnis – Appellant
Versus
Mukund Mart and Chitnis` – Respondent


JUDGMENT

A.D. Tated, J. - This petition is directed against the judgment and order dated 29th May, 1986 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, in Criminal Revision Application No. 204 of 1986 whereby he allowed the revision against the order dated 13th March. 1986 whereby the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Court No. 4, Pune, dismissed the application filed by respondent No. 1 Mukund Martand Chitnis for discharge under section 245(2), Criminal Procedure Code.

2. The facts leading to the present petition, shortly stated, are that the petitioner Smt. Madhuri Chitnis and respondent No. 1 Mukund Chitnis were married on 15th July, 1983. Immediately thereafter their relationship got strained and the petitioner had to leave the house of her husband on 6th August, 1983 and since then she is not residing with her husband. On 31st October, 1983 respondent No. 1 filed complaint Case No. 494 of 1983 against the petitioner and her near relations for the offences punishable under sections 420 and 378, read with section 34, IPC. In that case respondent No. 1 alleged that the petitioner was married and had a child and while the marriage was subsisting, she by suppressing

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top