SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.K.HOMCHAUDHURI
K. M. Mathew – Appellant
Versus
P. K. Thunugon – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.K. Bom Chaudhuri, J.- The opposite party filed a complaint petition for prosecution of the accused petitioner alleging commission of offence under Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 500/501/502 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 500/501/502 of the Indian Penal Code in the court of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Bomdila.

2. The learned Magistrate on perusal of the complaint and initial statement and evidence of some witnesses on behalf of the complainant, registered case C.R. 26 of 1988 under Section 12O-B of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 500/501/502 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 500/501/502 of the Indian Penal Code and issued summons to the accused petitioners on 2-6-88. After receipt of the summons from the court of the learned Magistrate, the accused petitioner filed a transfer petition in the Hon'ble Supreme Court praying for transfer of the case from Bomdila to New Delhi or any other state and the petition was registered as.

Transfer Petition (Criminal) No. 90 of 1988 in the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The Hon'ble Supreme Court after hearing both sides by order dated 25-1-89 dismissed the petition. The petitioner did not

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top