SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.RATNAVAL PANDIAN, K.JAYACHANDRA REDDY
Lala Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

K. Jayachandra Reddy, J.- The Sessions Court convicted all the ten accused under Section 148 and Section 302 read with Section 149 of Indian Penal Code and sentenced each of them to two years R.I. and life imprisonment under two counts respectively. The sentences were directed to run concurrently. The convicted accused preferred an appeal to the High Court of Allahabad. One of the accused Har Sewak who figured as Accused No. I died during the pendency of the appeal. The convictions and sentences of all the other nine accused were confinned. Hence they have prefered this appeal by way of special leave granted by this Court. During the Pendency of the appeal in this Court Accused No.3 and Accused No.9 died.

2. Learned Counsel appearing for the appellants submitted that the case arose out of an acute faction and the witnesses relied upon by both the courts below being partisans are highway interested and there was any number of circumstances indicating that the whole prosecution story is fabricated and at any rate the evidence can not be relied upon at all. Learned Counsel for the respondent State on the other hand submitted that the two courts below have accepted the eyidenc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top