SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

K.B.NAVADGI
Giridharilal – Appellant
Versus
Pratap Rai Mehta – Respondent


K.B. Navadgi, J.- This is a petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure (the Code for short). The petitioners have prayed to recall the order dated 4-11-1988 made by this Court in Criminal Revision Petition No. 398/88 and to quash the private complaint lodged by respondent No.1 against them taken on file by the IV Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore City in P.C.R. No. 87/88.

2. On hearing Shri Santosh Hegde, learned senior Counsel for the petitioners, notice was directed to respondent No. 1 regarding admission and orders. Learned High Court Government Pleader was requested to assist the Court in examining the maintainability or otherwise of the petition.

3. The record is perused. The learned senior Counsel for the petitioners, learned Counsel for respondent. No. 1 and the learned High Court Government Pleader are heard.

4. The question that arises for consideration and determination is:

(1) Whether the petition is maintainable?

5. The facts relevant to be referred to and noticed are these:

Shri Pratap Rai Mehta, respondent No. I, lodged a complaint against Giridharilal, Smt. Sonal J. Vora, Sri Dinesh G. Vora, Smt. Bina P. Vora and Sri Shashikant G. Vora, pet

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top