UDAY SINHA
Amrit Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Smt Indrajit Kaur – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Uday Sinha, J. - This is an application for quashing the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj dated 14-7-1983, by which he took cognizance of the offences under Sections 494/420/409 read with Section 114 of the Indian Penal Code. After taking cognizance, the learned Magistrate issued process against all the fourteen accused mentioned in the complaint. The petitioner's name figures at Serial No. 14 of the complaint.
2. In the complaint filed by opposite party it was alleged by her that she was the lawfully wedded wife of Sardar Satnam Singh and during the subsistence of the marriage Sardar Satnam Singh married the petitioner. Sardar Satnam Singh and the petitioner thus committed offences under Section 494 and other Sections of the Indian Penal Code as alleged. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, having taken cognizance; the present petitioner has moved this court for quashing the cognizance.
3. The only ground advanced in this application for quashing the order is that the learned Magistrate at Gopalganj had no jurisdiction to take cognizance of offence which had been committed at. Pratapgarh in the State of Uttar Pradesh. The grounds of the petitioner is that she w
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.