SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
(JAIPUR BENCH)
M.B. Sharma, J.
Amra Ram - Petitioner
versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
S.B. Crl. Revision Petition No. 2 of 1990
Decided on 23-3-1990
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner - Mr. Praveen Balwada.
For the Respondent

IMPORTANT POINT
Previous conviction or acquittal has to be proved only in accordance with the manner provided under Section 298, Cr. P.C.

Headnote:Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950 - Section 16/54(a)(c)(d) - Trial Court convicted and sentenced accused - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 374 - Accused appealed – Section 386 - Appellate Court dismissed appeal - Section 397/401 - Accused again challenged his conviction - Accused found manufacturing and in possession of illicit liquor - Question of sentence - No proof that accused a previous convict - Occurrence took place in 1981 - Accused aged about 70 years - Whether circumstances call for benefit of probation? (Yes) Effect - Conviction maintained, releasing accused on probation. (Paras 1 to 6)

       Result: Revision partly allowed.

       

Amra Ram VS State of Rajasthan
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top