SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.D.BAJAJ
State of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Virsa Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the parties :
For the Appellant S.K. Sharma,
D.A.G. Punjab.
For the Respondent -A.S. Kalra

JUDGMENT

S.D. Bajaj, J.- In pursuance of disclosure statement allegedly made by accused Virsa Singh to him S.I. Sardara Singh of Police Station Patti district Amritsar in Punjab State is alleged to have recovered from the conscious possession of the accused from inside the comer of his residential house in Ward No.9, Patti an explosive live hand granade on October 1, 1980. Vide its impugned judgment dated May 4, 1984 learned trial court acquitted the accused on the grounds that the disclosure statement was recorded before apprehending the accused in police custody and that the prosecution had not adduced any evidence to prove that the hand granade was recovered from the possession of the accused in circumstances giving rise to a reasonable suspicion that he had the same in possession not for a lawful object. Feeling aggrieved there from the State of Punjab has filed Criminal Appeal No. 550-DBA of 1984 in this Court.

2. We have heard Sri S.K. Sharma, D.A.G. Punjab, for the appellant State, Shri A.S. Kalra, Advocate, for the respondent and have carefully perused the relevant material on record.

3. Legal proposition availed of by the learned trial court for recording the judgment of a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top