J.U.MEHTA
Prabhavatiben Bipinchandra Rangunwala – Appellant
Versus
Bipinchandra Dhansukhlal – Respondent
ORDER
J.U. Mehta, J. The petitioner is the original applicant who has claimed maintenance under section 125, Cr. P.C. by filing Misc. Criminal Application No. 48 of 1988 on 3.3.1988 before the learned judicial Magistrate, I class. Surat for gelling maintenance from respondent No.1 on the ground that the petitioner is the married wife of respondent No.1 and without any cause or reason she was deserted by respondent No.1. On 19.8.1988 the petitioner filed -an application at Ext. 8 praying for interim maintenance till the final disposal of the main application, inter alia, alleging that the petitioner has no independent income of her own and she has to live a life depending upon her parents who are economically poor and if the interim maintenance is not awarded, she will have to starve. She has filed this application on solemn affirmation.
2. 1he learned Magistrate, after hearing the parties, rejected the application of the present petitioner for granting her interim maintenance. The order is annexed at Ext. A to this petition.
3. Being aggrieved by the said order of the learned Magistrate, the present petitioner preferred Criminal Revision Application No. 118 of 1989 before the Court
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.