SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PALOK BASU, S.K.VERMA
State of Uttar Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Raj Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the parties:
For the Appellant: P.K. Srivastava
For the Respondents: P.N. Misra

JUDGMENT

S.K. Verma, J. - Respondents Raj Kumar, Ashok Kumar and Ramesh Chand who had been charged with an offence under section 302/34 I.P.C. were acquitted by learned Sessions Judge Etawah vide judgment dated 30.4.1979. The state has filed his appeal against that judgment.

2. The prosecution version was that Raj Kumar and Ashok Kumar respondents who are real brothers and Ramesh Chand, respondent No. 3, brother-in-law of first two respondents assaulted the deceased Lalman or 15.3.1978 at about 6.30 P.M. in village Pitambarpur while the deceased was returning from Debiapur and proceeding to village Sehud. It is alleged that respondent No. 1 Raj Kumar was armed with a gun, respondent No. 2 Ashok Kumar was armed with a Tamancha and respondent No. 3 Ramesh Chand was armed with hockey and knife. Respondent No. 1 Raj Kumar is said to have fired from his gun, respondent No. 3 Ramesh Chand is said to have assaulted with hockey and also with a knife while respondent No. 2 Ashok Kumar is said to have fired from country made pistol resulting in immediate death of the victim.

3. The F.I.R. of the incident was lodged at the Police Station Debiapur on 15.3.1978 at about 7.30 P.M. after covering

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top