JUDGMENT

Virendra Saran, J. - This application u/s 482 Cr. P.C. (hereinafter referred to as Code) was filed in the Registry on 29.9.1992 and has come up before me today. The application was filed in person but the applicant is not present. I have perused the record and have also heard the learned State Counsel who agrees that the application may be family disposed of today.

2. By means of this application, the applicator has prayed for quashing of the order dated 30.5.1992, purporting to be u/s 111 of the Code, passed by Sub Divisional Magistrate, Modinagar in Criminal Case No. 147 of 1992, u/s 151, 107, 116 of the Code. The case presents a sorry state of affairs. The order u/s 111 of the Code has been passed on a printed proforma which blanks have been filled in by the learned Magistrate, Judicial orders are to be passed after applying mind to the facts and circumstances of the case. I have gone through the printed order passed u/s 111. It is distressing to note that there is no mention of the substance of information received by the learned Sub Divisional Magistrate on which he took section. Making an order u/s 111 of the Code is not an idle formality. It should be clear on the f