SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Ashok Agarwal, J.
Manikrao Abaji Thonge - Appellant
versus
State of Maharashtra - Respondent
Crl Appeal No. 347 of 1986
Decided on 4.2.1993

Advocates:
Counsel for the parties:
For the Appellant - S.M. Dandekar, Advocate.
For the Respondent - D.A. Nmavade, PP.

IMPORTANT POINT
Even if the illegal gratification is received after the official act is done, yet, it will constitute an offence u/s. 161, Indian Penal Code.

Headnote:(i) Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 Section 4 - Accused admitting acceptance of an amount - Presumption u/s. 4 - Burden shifts upon the accused to establish his defence by preponderance of probabilities: (Para 7)

       (ii) Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 294(3) - Sanction for prosecution under the Act - Validity challenged - Accused consented to the sanction order being proved u/r. 294 of the Code - Validity of the order not to be challenged at this stage. (Para 9)

       (iii) Prevention of Corruption, Act; 1947 Section 5.A - Mandatory provision - Investigation - Conducted by the Inspector of Police and not a Deputy Superintendent of Police - Violation of section 5-A. Not to affect the competence and. jurisdiction of the court - for trial where the cognizance has already been taken; (Bhajan Lal's Case; A.I.R. 1992 S.C. 1604: followed) (Para 10)

       (iv) Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 161 - Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Section's 5(1)(d) r/ws 5(2) -Illegal gratification received after the official act is done. An offence u/s.161 - Once it is shown that the amount has been received by a public servant by abusing it is position as a public servant and it is received by corrupt or illegal means, the offence is complete. (Para 12)

       Result: Appeal dismissed.

       

JUDGMENT

Ashok Agarwal, J. - By the present appeal, the appellant original accused, seeks to impunge an order of conviction and sentence imposed upon him by the learned Special Judge’ Sholapur, on 29.4.1986 in Special Case No. 4 of 1985. By the order the accused has been convicted under section 161 of toe Indian Penal Code and section 5(1)(d) read with section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act: For the offence under section 161, I.P.C. he has been sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 3 months and for the offence under section 5(1) (d) read with section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. he has been sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay fine of Rs. 750/-in default to suffer further rigorous imprisonment for 2 month. The substantive sentences have been directed to run concurrently.

2. The accused was charged in the aforesaid trial for having on 15.2.1985, 21.2.1985, and 23.4.1985 while he was serving as Circle Inspector, demanded a sum of Rs. 250/- from P.W. 1 Hanmant Nalavade as a motive of reward for doing an official act i.e approving the case papers regarding the inquiry into the application of Hanmant for opening a poultry farm under the Scheme of Financial Assistance to educated unemployed and for having finally accepted the said amount on 24.4.1985.

3. The case of the prosecution briefly stated is as under: The complainant P.W. 1 Hanmant had passed his B. Com., but was unemployed. He wanted to start a poultry farm. He, therefore, applied to the Government for grant of assistance. The application was forwarded to the Tahsildar for inquiry. The Tahsildar in turn sent the application to the accused and called for his report.

On 202.1985, the accused who was then a Circle Inspector sent a message through the Sarpanch and called the complainant. Accordingly, the complainant on 21.2.1985 contacted the accused in his office. The accused showed the complainant his papers concerning his application for assistance and recorded the statement of the complainant. The accused told the complainant that he would get land worth Rs. 2,500/- free of cost and that the complainant should pay him Rs. 250/-. The accused also asked the complainant to produce certain documents. The accused also asked him to obtain a resolution of the Gram Panchayat regarding its to objection for the grant of land. The accused asked him to produce the documents and also 10 bring Rs. 250/-.

The complainant applied to the Gram. Panchayat and the Gram Panchayat on 23.1.1985 passed the necessary resolution. On 1.3.1985, the complainant went to the office of the accused and handed over the resolution to the accused. The complainant stated that he was unable to obtain the requisite documents from the Malachi. The accused offered to secure the necessary documents. When asked for the amount, the complainant expressed his inability to pay Rs. 250/- at once. He agreed to pay some amount at that time and pleaded that the work should be done. He assured that he will pay the balance later on. The accused, however, insisted on lump sum payment and unless the payment was made the work would not be done.

Again on 15.4.1985, the complainant went to the accused and asked him about his work. The accused reiterated his demand and stated that if payment is made, work will be done. He stated that the case papers will not be forwarded unless payment was made. The accused stated that till the delivery of possession, the entire matter was under his control and whenever the complainant makes payment he will complete his work the accused told him he had received the relevant documents from the Talathi.

On 23.4.1985, the complainant came to Barshi. He was on his way to Solapur for an interview in response to an interview call through employment exchange. On that day he had brought tiffin box of P.W. 3 Buvasaheb Agav who belonged to his village. The nephew of Buvasaheb was in the hospital at Barshi and Buvasaheb was attending on him. Buvasahe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top