SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.M. Ahmadi, and S. Nohan, JJ.
Goutam Kundu - Appellant
versus
State of West Bengal
& another - Respondents
Criminal Appeal No. 443 of 1993
(Arising out of SLP (Cr.)
No. 2648 of 1992
Decided on 14.5.1993

Advocates:
Counsel for the parties:
For the Appellant - Ashok Sen.

IMPORTANT POINT
Courts in India cannot order blood test as a matter of course for determination of paternity of a child.

Headnote:Evidence Act, 1873 - Section 112, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 125 -Petitioner disputing paternity of the child - Prayer for blood group test of the child - Courts in India cannot order blood test as a matter of course. Court must carefully examine as to what would be the consequent of ordering the blood test - No one can be compelled to give sample of blood for analysis - There must be a strong prima-facie case in that husband must establish non-access in order to dispel the presumption arising under section J12 of the Evidence Act - Purpose of application being nothing more than to avoid payment of maintenance, there is no illegality in impugned order dismissing the application.

       Result: Appeal dismissed.

       

JUDGMENT

Mohan, J. – Leave granted.

The appellant herein was married to second respondent on 16th January, 1990 according, to Hindu Rites and Customs. They lived together for sometime until second respondent left the matrimonial home to reside with her parents in order to prepare for Higher Secondary Examination which commenced on 5.4.1990 and continued up to 10.5.1990. In the month of April, 1990 shy conceived, on coming to know that she was pregnant, the appellant and the family members did not want her to beget a child. Therefore she was forced to undergo abortion which was refused by the second respondent. During the stay she was meted out cruel treatment both physically and mentally. She came back to the matrimonial home during

Durga Pooja in the month of October, 1990. A female child was born on 3.1.1991. She filed a petition under section 125 Cr. P.C. before the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipore in. Misc. Case No. 143 of 1991 both for herself and the child. By an order dated 14,8.1991 which was passed ex-parte he awarded a sum of Rs.300/- per mansum to the mother and Rs. 200/- to the child. Against that order, he moved a revision, to the High Court That revision is pending as 1837 of 1991. Thereafter the petitioner filed a Crl. Misc. Case No. 143 of 1991 for blood group test of the second respondent and the child.

In that proceeding the petitioner herein disputed the paternity of the child and prayed for blood group test of the child to prove that he was not the father of the child. According to him if that could be established he would not be liable to pay maintenance. That application was dismissed on two grounds: in there were other methods in the Evidence Act to disprove the paternity; (ii) moreover, it is settled law that medical test cannot be conclusive of paternity.

Aggrieved by this order, a revision was preferred before the High Court. Dismissing .the revision it was held that section 112 of the Evidence Act says where during the continuance of valid marriage if a child is born that is a conclusive proof about the legitimacy. This section would constitute a stumbling block in the way of the petitioner getting his paternity disproved by blood group test.

The English law permitting blood test for determining the paternity of legitimacy could not be applied in view of section 112 of the Evidence Act. Therefore it must be conducted that section 112 read with section 4 of the said Act debars evidence except in cases of non-access for disproving the presumption of legitimacy and paternity.

It is the contention of Mr. Ashok Sen, learned counsel for the appellant that the only way for the father to disprove the paternity is by blood group test. Having regard to the development of medical jurisprudence to deny that request to the appellant will be unreasonable. As a matter of fact, in England, this is commonly resorted to as it will leave no room for doubt. In 1968 (1) All England Reports p.20 Re. L. it was held that even without the consent of the guardian ad litem, the court had power to order an infant be subjected to a blood group test.

There is no justification for the court below to refuse the same on the ground that section 112 of the Evidence Act would be an obstacle in seeking relief of blood group test Before we deal with the arguments, we will examine the law as available in England. At the beginning of the century scientists established that human blood had certain characteristics which could be genetically transmitted. The first recognised system was ABO blood group. The blood group of a child is determined by the parents genetic make-up but the number of possibilities is such, that it is not possible to prove that certain individuals are the father on the basis of comparing blood groups, only that they are not the father.

By 1930s other immunological test became available. As a result the possibility of establishing paternity increased. An attempt by way of statutory provision to make blood test

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top