D.N.BARUAH, R.K.MANISANA SINGH
Siddique Ali – Appellant
Versus
Md. Ali – Respondent
JUDGMENT AND ORDER
Baruah, J. - This Criminal Revision has been referred by the learned single Judge to decide the following questions:-
"Whether an order passed under section 146(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code attaching the land in dispute can be treated as an interlocutory order or not"
2. This has been referred in view of different views expressed in two decisions in Indrapuri Primary Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. & Anr. v. Bhabani Gogoi1 and Urikhimbam Kala Singh v. Takhell Lambam juginder Singh & Ors.2. In Urikhimbam Kala Singh (supra) Hansaria, J. held that an order of attachment under section 146(1) cannot be treated as interlocutory order and therefore revision would lie. On the other hand the recent decision reported in 1990 GHC-583 one of us (Manisana, J.) held that the order under section 146(1) is an interlocutory order and no revision lies under section 397(2) of the Cr. P.C. In this revision, we are therefore required to answer the reference. We have heard Mr. S.H. Bhuyan, Learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B.P. Borah, learned Counsel for the opposite party.
3. Section 146 is a part of section 145 under which a Magistrate declares possession of a party
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.