SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RAJENDAR SAXENA
Phool. Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


ORDER

Rajendra Saxena, J. - The petitioner by means of this writ petition has prayed that the order dated 2.12.1991 (Annex. 1) issued by the joint legal remembrance and Director, Litigation Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur appointing Shri Ram Chandra Deopura, Advocate, Rajsarnand (respondent No. 2) as Special Public Prosecutor in Sessions Case No. 119191 (State v. Bhanwar Singh & Ors under section 302 I.P.C. pending in the court of Sessions Judge, Rajsamand and directing that all the expenses incurred by respondent N. 2 shall be paid by Shri Nand Lal Rawal (respondent No. 3), be quashed and that a further direction be given to proceed de novo in the said sessions trial with the assistance of an independent Public Prosecutor.

2. The petitioner is the son-in-law of one of the accused persons namely Bhanwar Singh, who is facing the aforesaid sessions trial along with 7 other accused persons. The petitioner has challenged the impugned Order letter dated 2.12.1991 (Annex. 1) on the ground that since Nand Lal (respondent No. 3), the brother of deceased Sunder Lal in the aforementioned Sessions Case, has been directed to pay the remuneration to the Special Public Prosecutor instead of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top