SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

D.P.MOHAPATRA
Paradesi Patra – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent


ORDER

D.P. Mohapatra, J. - In both the cases the accused persons have filed applications under section 439(1)(b) read with section 440(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure assailing the condition in the bail orders to furnish cash security. Since a common question is raised in both the cases and as the orders passed by the Courts below show that similar consideration were made by the learned Magistrate and by the learned Sessions Judge while insisting on cash security, the cases were taken up together with consent of learned counsel for the parties and they are being disposed of by this order.

2. Both the Criminal Misc. Cases arise from Lahunipada P.S. Case No 12 of 1993 which corresponds to G.R. Case No 320f 1993 pending in the Court of the Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bonal in which the petitioners are alleged to have committed offences punishable under section 143/341/294/336/506 I.P.C.

3. As stated in the application filed under Sec. 439(1) read with section 440(2) Cr. P.C. (Criminal Misc. Case NO 617/93) the gist of the allegations made in the First Information Report lodged by one D.K. Bhargav of Jindal Strips Ltd. Tensa is to the effect that on 30.1.1993 at 7.30 a.m.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top