SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

R.S.VERMA
Jodha Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


ORDER

R.S. Verma, J - This application under Sec. 482 Cr. P.C. was initially filed for grant of anticipatory bail under Sec. 438 Cr. P.C. However, when the matter was being argued finally, the learned counsel for the petitioner urged that he may be permitted to treat this petition as one filed under Sec. 482 Cr P.C. in the circumstances of the case I permitted him to do so. Hence, the application has been heard under Sec. 482 Cr. P.C. It may be so registered by the office.

2. Now, the factual matrix. The petitioner is a resident of Sojat City within territorial limits of Add Sessions Judge, Sojat exercising jurisdiction in Session Division, Pali. The petitioner apprehended his arrest in connection with F.I.R. No. 88 of 1993 of P.S. Fatehpur, for offences under Sections 302, 304, 328 I.P.C. read with Sec. 54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act. Hence, he moved an application for grant of anticipatory bail under Sec. 438 Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter 'the Code') before the learned Add Sessions Judge, Sojat. Admittedly, P.S. Fatehpur did not fall with in the territorial jurisdiction of Additional Sessions Judge, Sojat but fell within the jurisdiction of Sessions Judge, Sikar. By the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top