ORDER

Arunachalam, J. - Petitioner Lakshmi is the mother of Velu, who is A-1 in C.c. 3 of 1993, pending on the file of First Additional Designated Court, Madras. On 14.9.1993, Designated Court framed 11 charges against Velu and A-2 Sisubalan, which include commission of offence punishable under Sections 3(2), 3(3), 4, 5 and 6 of TADA (P) Act, 1987. Other offences alleged are punishable under the provisions of Indian Penal Code, Railway Act and Explosive Substances Act.

2. This is not the first time, that the petitioner has chosen to approach this Court, on behalf of her son Velu, for at least from the records placed before us, she had invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court, on four earlier occasions.

3. We deem, it necessary to state the details- of those writ petitions and the orders passed thereon, for we are unable to exclude an impression, that every time, same grounds are sought to be put forth for a decision before this Court, whether taken in the memorandum or not, and the ultimate purpose appears to be intended, to delay the progress, in trial. Even in the instant Habeas Corpus Petition, though grounds taken in the memorandum are very limited, Mr. R. Sankarasubbu, lear