SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SAT PAL
Suraj Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sat Pal, J. – This is a petition filed by the petition under Article 22/of the Constitution of India read with Section 439 and 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure therefore referred to as Code) and in has been prayed by Sheri S.N. Kapur, Additional Sessions Judge, Shahadara, a Designated Court under Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention be ordered to be released on bail in terms of earlier bail order.

2. Briefly stated that facts of the case are that the petitioner was arrested under Section 307/34, I.P.C. 27/54/59 Arms and Section 5 of TADA Pertaining to F.I.R. No. 410/92 P.S. Gokulpur therefore the learned Additional Sessions Judge Shahdara vide order dated 5th November, 1992 granted bail that the petitioner would not visit the locality of Mangat Ram (Respondent No.2) who was the complainant in the said F.I.R. without prior permission of the Court.

3. The petitioner filed an application before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Shahdara seeking permission of the Court to visit Village Sabhapur where respondent No. 2 is residing, to attend the last rites of his deceased real uncle on 26th August, 1993 and 29th August, 1993 and the learned Additional Sessio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top