SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

A.S.ANAND, FAIZAN UDDIN
State of Uttar Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Babul Nath – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Faizan Uddin, J. - The respondent Babul Nath a young man of 32 years was charged and tried for an offence punishable under Section 376 of the Penal Code for committing rape on Kumari Nirmala Devi, a child aged about 5 years, in the afternoon of 15.3.1917 in the grove of one Baleshwar Pathak in village Rampa within the jurisdiction of Police Station Bhadohi, District Varanasi. In Sessions Trial No. 26/78 the learned Sessions Judge, Varanasi found the respondent guilty of the offence charged with and, therefore, convicted him under Section 376 I.P.C. and sentenced him to suffer imprisonment for five years. On appeal by the respondent the High Court rejected the testimony of the sole eye-witness Ram Lakhan, P.W. 1, set aside the conviction and sentence imposed on the respondent and acquitted him of the charge of rape. The State of Uttar Pradesh has, therefore, approached this Court in. appeal under Article 136 of the Constitution of India on grant of leave.

2. The prosecution case as it emerges out of the written report made by Ram Lakhan, P.W. l is that on 15.3.1977 at about 4 P.M. when Ram Lakhan, P.W. l, Jokhan Ram, P.W. 2, Kansraj, P.W. 3 and Kauleshwar while passing by t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top