SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

A.S.ANAND, M.K.MUKHERJEE
Nisar – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

M.K. Mukherjee, J. -Special leave granted.

The appellant No. 1 is the brother-in-law of Shakvin who met with an unnatural death in her matrimonial home on June 22. 1991. The appellant No. 2 is his wife. On the following day i.e. an June 23, 1991 Noor Mohammad, father of the deceased, lodged a First Information Report alleging that her husband, grand mother-in-law and two appellants were responsible for her death. On that information a case was registered under sections 304 Band 306 of the Indian Penal Code ('IPC' for short) against all of them and on completion of investigation the police submitted charge-sheet under section 306 IPC only against the deceased's husband and grand mother-in-law. In due course the case was committed to the Court of Session by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Orai ('Magistrate' for short in accordance with section 209 of the Criminal Procedure Code ('Code' for short).

2. When the matter came up for hearing before an Additional Session Judge of Orai, an application was moved on behalf of No or Mohammad alleging that though during investigation sufficient materials were furnished to prove that the two appellants had also demanded a scooter as dowry

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top