Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.P. Jeevan Reddy, G.N. Ray and N.P. Singh, JJ.
Sanjay Dutt – Petitioner
versus
State through C.B.I., Bombay - Respondent
Crl. Misc. Petition Nos. 3338 - 3339 of 1994
In
Special Leave Petition (Crl.) Nos. 1834-1835 of 1994
All Decided on 23.9.1994
Counsel for the parties:`
For the Petitioner - Kapil Sibal, Advocate.
For the Respondent - Natarajan, Advocate.
Result: Petition dismissed.
ORDER
B.P. Jeevan Reddy, J. - Pursuant to the direction of the Constitution Bench contained in its Judgment dated September 9, 1994, the bail petition was posted before us on 21st September, 1994. We heard Sri Kapil Sibal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Natarajan, learned counsel for the respondent fully.
2. We are not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this juncture. It is not necessary or advisable to say more than this at this stage. The petition is accordingly rejected.
3. It shall, however, be open to the petitioner to renew his request for bail before the Designated Court after his defence evidence is adduced at the trial.
Petition dismissed.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
