SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

JANARTHANAM
P. A. Saleem – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


ORDER

Janarthanam, J. - These petitions coming on for hearing on Monday, the 27th day of June 1994, upon perusing the petitions and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. M. Karpagavinayagam, Advocate for the petitioner in Crl. O.P. No. 3995/94 and of Mrs. S. Panneerselvam, Advocate for the petitioner in Crl. O.P. Nos. 4810 to 4813 of 1994, and of Mr. George Charles, Advocate for the petitioner in Crl. O.P. No. 4925 of 1994, and of Mr. G. Jeremiah, Advocate for the Petitioner in Crl. O.P. Nos. 4934 and 4975 of 1994, and of Mr. K.P. Muthu Mohan, Advocate for the petitioner in Crl. O.P. No. 4966 of 1994, and of Mr. B. Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner in Crl. O.P. No. 4968/ 94, and of Mr. S. Ashok Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner in Cr!. O.P. No. 4970/94 and of Mr. N. Pappiah, Advocate for the petitioner in Crl. O.P. No. 4972/94 and of Mr. T. Baskaran, Advocate for the petitioner in Crl. O.P. No. 4979/94 and of Mr. P. Punniyakotti, Advocate for the petitioner in Crl. O.P. No. 4984/94, and of Mr. K. Sampathkumar, Advocate for the petitioner in Crl. O.P. No. 4989/94, and of Mr. P. Rajendra, Advocate for the Petitioner in Crl. O.P. No. 4990/94, 4992/94, 5136/94, and of Mr. C.V. Kumar, Adv

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top