SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.D.PANDIT, P.K.BAHRI
Amarjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
State (Delhi Admn. ) – Respondent


JUDGMENT

P.K. Bahri, J. - The appellants Amarjit Singh and Prem Prakash have been convicted of offences punishable under Section 20 of the Nareotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act vide judgment dated May 25, 1992, by an Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, and Amarjit Singh has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of twenty years and to pay a fine of Rs. 2,00,000/- and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for period of two years more. The appellant Prem Prakash, however, has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and to pay, a fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for one year more. They have filed the present appeal challenging their convictions and sentences.

2. Facts leading to the prosecution of the appellants, in brief, are that a secret informer on May 8, 1987, had given the information to the Special Staff of Morris Nagar area that a Sikh gentleman would be bringing contraband in a Jonga Jeep of gray colour on outer ring road for going to Mukherjee Nagar. A raiding party was organized by the Special Staff which comprised of Sub-Inspectors Data Ram, Jagram, Mohan Singh, Asst. Sub

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top