SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

N.DHINAKAR
State of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
Sajeev Mathew – Respondent


ORDER

N. Dhinakar, J.- Cr. M.C. 1470/95 is by the State, to set aside the order of the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ernakulam, releasing the respondent, first accused, in Crime No. 118/95 on the file of the Hill Palace Police Station, on bail and to order his police custody for the purpose of investigation in the said crime number.

2. Crl. M.C. 1458/95 is a petition filed by accused 2 to 4 for anticipatory bail in the same number.

3. Crl. R.C. 9/95 is taken suo motu by the High Court, on the orders of My Lord The Chief Justice, to consider the propriety of the orders of the learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ernakulam, in granting bail to the 1st accused.

As the issue to be decided in all the above matters is the same, the following common order is being passed.

4. Shorn of all unnecessary details, few facts do need mentioning. On a complaint given by a Sam Joseph, Cochin, on 8-8-1995, a case in Crime.

No. 118/95 was registered at Hill Palace Police Station against the accused 1 to 4 (the respondent in Crl. M.C. 1470/95, and the petitioners in Crl. M.C. 1458/95 respectively and they will be referred to as accused in this order for the sake of convenience) for an offence p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top