MIRDHE, VISHWANATH
State of Karnataka – Appellant
Versus
Mahesha – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Mr. Mirdhe, J. - This Criminal Appeal is preferred by the State against the judgment dated 30.6.92 passed by the Sessions Judge, Madikeri, in S.C. 33/86 acquitting the respondents - accused of the offences punishable under Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and under Sections 302 read with Section 114 and Section 304-B IPC.
2. We have heard Mr. Marigowda, learned High Court Government Pleader for the appellant-State and Sri Bhagwan, learned Counsel for the respondents, fully and perused the records of the case.
3. The case of the prosecution is as follows: The deceased Leelavathy was the legally wedded wife of accused No. 1. Her marriage with accused NO.1 took place on 18.6.86 at Shetty Chatram, Ramanathapuram. Before the finalisation of the marriage with accused No.1, the accused demanded a dowry of Rs. 30,000/- and 15 tolas of gold, but due to the intervention of the elders that demand of dowry came to be reduced and it was agreed by the father of the deceased that he would pay Rs. 10,000/- cash and 51/2 tolas of gold besides marriage expenses to be born by the father of the bride. The father of Leelavathy gave cash of Rs. 2000/- to Puttaswamy, A-2 and the rem
Kushal Rao v. State of Bombay; AIR 1958 SC 22.
Rabichandra Padhan & Ors. v. State of Orissa; AIR 1980 SC 1738.
K Ramachandra Reddy & Anr. v. The Public Prosecutor; AIR 1976 SC 1994.
Lallubhai Devchand Shah & Ors. v. The State of Gujarat; AIR 1972 SC 1776.
State of Gujarat v. Khuman Singh Karan Singh & Ors.; AIR 1994 SC 1641.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.