1996(1) Crimes 189 (SC)
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Kuldip Singh and Falzon Uddin, JJ.
R.D. Upadhyay - Petitioner
versus
State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. -Respondents
Writ Petition (C) No. 559 of 1994
Decided on 19-3-1996
Order: Delhi High Court asked to nominate 10 additional district judges to exclusively take up trial of these cases-Dispose of within six months.
(ii) Public Interest Litigation Constitution of India, Articles 32 and 21 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 307-Undertrials in Tihar Jail - Charged with attempt to Murder - Cases pending for more than two years - Release or bail forthwith to satisfaction of trial Courts -Application for bail not required - Court to consider suo moto.
(iii) Public Interest Litigation Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 21- Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 324, 326, 354, 363, 378 and 420 - Arms Act - Customs Act, 1962 - Undertrial in Jails facing trial for Kidnapping, Theft, Cheating, Counterfeiting, Rioting, Hurt, Grievous hurt or under Arms Act -Customs Act - In detention for more than one year-Release on bail forthwith - Unable to furnish security.....Release on personal bond - Application for bail not required - Court to consider suo moto.
(iv) Public Interest Litigation - Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 21 - Persons charged under Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 304, 376, 390 and 391 - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act; Official Secrets Act, 1924; Ex-tradition Act; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Act - Dowry Prohibition Act-Appropriate decision to be taken by Delhi Administration.
ORDER
This public interest petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India has been filed by Mr. R.D. Upadhyay, an advocate of this Court. It has been highlighted in the petition that a large number of under-trial prisoners have been languishing in Tihar Jail without trail for a very long period. This Court by the order dated November 7, 1994 directed the Superintendent Tihar Jail to file an affidavit giving list of under-trial inmates of Jail who are confined "for over a period of one year. Sh. Tarsem Kumar, Superintendent, Central Jail, Tihar has filed an affidavit dated February 9, 1996 and has anhexed a list giving Jail wise break-up of under-trials who have spent more than one year at Central Jail, Tihar, Delhi as on January 25, 1996. The list indicates that n there are under-trial prisoners who are in jail for a period ranging from one year to 11 years. Mr. Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for the NCT, Delhi has categorised the list of under-trials offence-wise. The total cases categorized by Mr. Srivastava come to 1930. The list is as under:
S. No.
Name of offences
Total Cases
1.
Murder
880
2.
Attempt to murder
89
3.
N.D.P.S.
264
4.
Rape
137
5.
Kidnapping
68
6.
Dacoity & Robbery
188
7.
TADA
122
8.
Dowry & 304 IPC
74
9.
Theft
55
10.
Cheating
10
11.
Arms Act
18
12.
Counterfeiting
6
13.
Official Secret Act
8
14.
Custom
1
15.
Escape
1
16.
U/s. 326 IPC
2
17.
U/s. 324 IPC
1
18.
Riots
3
19.
Extradition Act
1
20.
U/s. 354 IPC
1
Total Cases
1930
We have heard learned counsel for the parties. The learned counsel agree that a speedy trial is guaranteed as a Fundamental Right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. So far as 880 murder cases are concerned, we request the Delhi High Court to nominate/ designate Ten Additional District Judges to take up exclusively the trial of these cases. The High Court may consider directing the Additional District Judges, so nominated, to dispose of these cases within a period of six months or so.
So far as, the cases regarding attempt to murder are concerned, we direct that the cases which are pending for more than 2 years, the under-trials shall be released on bail forthwith of the satisfaction of the respective trial courts. Persons facing trial for Kidnapping, Theft, Cheating, Arms Act, Counterfeiting, Custom, Under Section 326 IPC Under Section 324 IPC, Riots and Under Section 354 IPC who are in jail for a period of more than one year, shall be released on bail forthwith to the satisfaction of the trial courts concerned. There may be cases where the under-trial persons, may not be in a position to furnish sureties etc. In those cases, the trial courts may consider - keeping in view the facts of each case especially the period spent in jail - releasing them on bail by furnishing personal bonds.
We make it clear that it shall not be necessary for any of the under - trials to move application for ball. The court shall, suo mota, on the authority of this Court's order, consider the bail cases. This shall be done by all the courts concerned within two weeks of the receipt of this order. We give liberty to all concerned to approach this Court for further directions, if necessary.
A copy of this order be sent to the District & Sessions Judge, Delhi by tomorrow. He shall issue the necessary directions in this respect to all the Courts functioning under his jurisdiction. A copy of this order be also sent to the Superintendent, Tihar Jail with a direction that he shall bring this order to the notice of all the concerned under –trial.
So far as the under-trial accused of the offences under NDPS, Rape, Dacoity & Robbery, TADA, Dowry and Under Section 304 IPC, Official Secret Act, Escape, and Extradition Act are concerned, the NCT - Delhi Administration may consider and take appropriate decision In this respect. We are informed by Mr. N.N. Goswami that the matter is already under consideration of the NCT, Delhi Administration.
Copy of this order may be sent to the Chief Justice Delhi H
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.