SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

M.K.MUKHERJEE, G.B.PATTANAIK
Niranjan Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

M.K. Mukherjee, J. - 26 persons including the 10 appellants were arraigned before the Sessions Judge, Jabbalpore for rioting, two murders and other allied offences. The trial ended in an acquittal or all of them; and aggrieved thereby the respondent-State of Madhya Pradesh filed an application seeking leave to appeal under Section 378 Cr. P.C. The High Court however granted leave only against the 10 appellants (the respondents therein). After hearing the parties the High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the acquittal of the 10 appellants and convicted and sentenced each of them for offences punishable under Sections 148, 325/149, 302/149 (one count) IPC. Aggrieved thereby the appellants have filed the present appeal under Section 379 Cr. P.C.

2. Briefly stated the prosecution case is on July 2, 1981 at or about 10. A.M. when Gajadhar (PW 3) alongwith his sons Bhagwat and Lakhanlal and wife Kusumbai were cultivating their land, which is at a short distance from their village, the accused persons came there variously armed. While the appellants Niranjan prasad and Narayan Prasad (since dead) had rifles with them the other appellants were carrying weapons like lathis, spea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top