R.D.SHUKLA, S.B.SAKRIKAR
High Court Bar Association – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
R.D. Shukla, J. - This order shall also dispose of W.P. No. 290/97 as common question of law and facts arise in both the cases. Powers vested in the High Court under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India have been invoked in both the cases.
2. The case of petitioner - High Court Bar Association. Indore through one of its members Shri Ashok Kutumbale has made averments as follows:
Petitioner is Association and looks after the welfare of its members. The office of respondent No. 3 Collector Central Excise & Customs (Appeals) was established at Indore vide Notification No. 16/90 (N.T.) - Cus., dated 6-4-1990 (Annexure P/l).
3. The establishment of office of respondent No.3 at Indore was done as major part of appellate work arise from Indore and Pithampur (Industrial Area) and as also Indore being nearer to Dewas (other industrial area), large number of industries are established in different parts of city and its surrounding areas. It was a facility to the public industries that they save their substantial amount from visiting office distinctly placed.
It has further been submitted that the Union of India respondent No.1 has decided to shift the office to Bhopal whic
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.