SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MOHD.SHAMIM
Raja – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Qaisar Kazim, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Pawan Behl, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mohd. Shamim, J. - This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 14th

December, 1993 passed by Mr. M.S. Rohilla, Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi where through the convict/appellant (hereinafter referred to as the appellant for the sake of convenience) was found guilty under section 307 of the Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years with a fine of Rs. 2,000/- In case of his failure to clear the fine he was further sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a year.

2. Brief facts which led to the present appeal are as under: that P.W. 7 Ram Bharose along with P.W.9 Ram Vilas went to their hut (jhuggi) situated in Block No.11 near a dirty drain in Tilak Nagar, New Delhi on 22nd July, 1989 at 4.30 P.M. to collect there from fruits in a rickshaw belonging to one P.W.8 Arun Paswan. P.W. 8 Arun Paswan stopped his rickshaw at a distance of 15- 16 paces away from the above said hut. Where after injured P.W. 7 Ram Bharose and P.W. 8 Ram Vilas covered that distance on foot. The appellant at that time was lying on a cot opposite to the entrance of the hut of the complainant Ram Vilas whereby he virtually blocke

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top