SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KRISHNA SARAN SHRIVASTAV
Girdhari Lal Rathi – Appellant
Versus
P. T. V. Ranianujachari – Respondent


ORDER

Krishna Saran Shrivastav, J. -This is an appeal against the acquittal of the first respondent of the charge levelled against him under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.

2. The case of the appellant-complainant in brief is that he deals in manufacture of General Mercandise and had business dealings with the first respondent who owed a sum of Rs. 5,45.000/ - as per the settlement of account did, 31st March. 1990. The first respondent, in discharge of his liability to pay the said amount. issued a cheque for Rs. 5.45.000/ -drawn on Canara Bank. Sultan Bazar. Hyderabad. The appellant presented the cheque with his banker which sent for realisation to the bank of the first respondent but it was dishonoured, and therefore, the appellant issued a registered notice which was served on the first respondent on 26-6-1990 But the first respondent/accused did not make the payment and therefore, he is liable to be convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

3. Charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was framed and explained to the first respondent-accused who denied the guilt. He examined himself in defence.

4. In trial Court, on assessment of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top