SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

J.G.CHITRE
S. K. Singhal – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhay Pradesh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

J.G. Chitre, J. - This petition is finally decided for the purpose of avoiding obstruction to the trial.

2. It is the prayer of the applicant that Court should give directions to the witness Vijay Kumar (complainant) to bring some documents, which are in his possession and control, which are connected with the trial of the petitioner and his defence in it. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that those documents were relevant and necessary for the trial, however, when the prayer was made for issuing directions to the said witness Vijay Kumar to bring those documents at the time of his evidence, the Court rejected his prayer by observing that the petitioner-accused may make a prayer for calling those documents to be produced in the Court in his defence through defence witness.

3. Mr. Jaisingh submitted that those documents are necessary at the time of evidence of complainant Vijay Kumar because those documents would be required for confronting complainant Vijay Kumar at the time of his cross-examination. According to Mr. Jaisingh, if those documents are not shown to complainant Vijay Kumar in his cross-examination, a serious prejudice would be caused to the petitio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top