SUJATA V.MANOHAR, D.P.WADHWA
Pepsi Foods Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Special Judicial Magistrate – Respondent
JUDGMENT
D.P. Wadhwa, J-Leave granted.
2. The appellants are aggrieved by the judgment dated September 23, 1996 of the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Lucknow Bench) dismissing their writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution. The appellants’ sought quashing of the complaint filed against them under Section 7 read with Section 16 of the Prevention of food Adulteration Act, 1954 (for short 'the Acf). The prayers in the writ petition were worded as under:
(a) Issue a writ of prohibition or a writ, order or direction in the nature of prohibition, prohibiting the Opposite Party Number-1 to proceed with case No. 699 of 1994 (Anurag Narain v. Nitin Sachdeva and others);
(b) Issue a writ of certiorari or a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the proceedings in Case No. 699 of 1994 together with the consequential order dated 9.5.1994 and the complaint dated 6.5.1993 in so far as it pertains to the petitioners;
(c) Issue a writ of mandamus or a writ. Order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Opposite Party Number-1 Dot to, proceed with the Case No. 699 of 1994 during the pendency of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.