SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

B.M.THULASIDAS, D.SREEDEVI
Kunjan Panicker – Appellant
Versus
Christudas – Respondent


JUDGMENT

B.M. Thulasidas, J - This appeal is by the complainant is S.T. No. 67 of 1990 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Neyyattinkara, who was the respondent in Crl. A. No.6 of 1992 of the 1st Additional Sessions Court, Trivandrum, filed by the respondent herein against his conviction and sentence for offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which were set aside and he was acquitted. The appellant obtained Ext. P.1 cheque dated 22-10-1989 for Rs. 26,600/- from him towards payment of the amount he advanced, that was dishonoured by the Catholic Syrian Bank, Neyyattinkara Branch on 31-10-1989, with the endorsement "refer to drawer". There upon information was given to him, at whose request the cheque was re-presented on 15-11-1989 and it was again dishonoured as per Ext. P.2 memorandum dated 24-11-1989 that was received along with the cheque on 4-121989. On the very next day, a notice was issued to him demanding payment of the amounts, that he did not accept and it was returned on 7-12-1989 as "not claimed". He waited for some time for him to make the payment that he did not, and therefore, the complaint was filed.

2. At the trial the respondent denied the e

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top