SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

T.RANGA RAO
Suraj Theatre, a partnership firm by Managing Partner – Appellant
Versus
Kakarla Bharathi – Respondent


ORDER

T. Ranga Rao, J - This petition is filed under Section 482 Cr. P.C. to quash the proceedings in C.C. No. 220/95 on the file of the III Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada.

2. The facts in giving rise to the filing of this petition are briefly as follows:

The first respondent represented by the General Power of Attorney Holder, filed a complaint against the petitioners under Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable instruments Act alleging that A-1 is a partnership firm with its office at Vuyyuru, Krishna District. A-2 is the Managing Partner and A-2 to A-5 are the partners of the said firm. It is further stated that A-2 to A-5 as partners of the A-1 firm are in charge and responsible and playing active role in the management and in day-to-day conduct of business of A-1 firm. It is further alleged that A-1 borrowed Rs. 30,000/- Rs. 21,000/- and Rs. 30,000/ - on 28.11.1988, 7.12.1989 and 28-9-1994 respectively and executed promissory notes promising to pay interest at 30% per annum, and issued cheque dtd. 25-5-1992 for Rs. 1,50,000/- in favour of the complainant drawn on Indian Bank, Vuyyuru and the same was presented for collection at Andhra Bank. Vijayawada but it was returned

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top