SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

M.M.PUNCHHI, K.VENKATASWAMI
Baitullah – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

K. Venkataswami, J-Thisappeal is preferred under Section 379 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with a double murder which took place at about 10.00 a.m. on 26.4.79. Seven accused, namely, Sirajul Haq, Abdulas, Anwar ALi Zainul Abdin, Yunus, Haroon and Baitullah, were charged under Section 147,148,302 read with Section 149, I.P.C. The case of the prosecution as called out from the paper book is as follows

2. On the fateful day the deceased Nabi Rasool, brother of Informant in the case and another deceased Nisar Ahmed, cousin of the informant, were going from east to west in Chhithi village within Mahuli Police Station, Basti District. When all the accused were concealing their presence behind a Masjid, which was on the eastern side of the house of Sirajul Haq accused As soon as both the deceased reached near the Masjid. Accused 1 3 and 4 gave a lalkara to kill the accused. On this, the deceased raised alarms and ran towards the north of the Masjid. At that time PWS 2, 3, and 4, who were sitting at the door of one Abdul Rashid, ran towards them. In the meantime, A-2 dealt a spear blow on the chest of Nisar Ahmad. On account of that, he fell down in the field of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top