SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

P.K.DEB
Santosh Mandals – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Prasun Kumar Deb, J. - This appeal has arising out of the judgment and order dated 2-6-1992 passed the then 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Dhanbad, in Sessions Trial No. 89 of 1990 convicting the appellants under Section 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and also under Sect ion 498A of he Indian Penal Code and then under Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act (the Act) and they have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code: for three years rigorous imprisonment under Section 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code for six months rigorous imprisonment under Section 3 of the Act and for six years rigorous imprisonment under Section 4 of the Act read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. All the sentences have been ordered to run concurrently.

2. The case arose out of the unnatural death of Manju Mandalani of which the Fardbeyan was submitted by her brother Dharnidhar Mandal (P .W, 3) on 22-5-1989 at about 8.30 P.M. The Fardbeyan was recorded at the house of the accused persons where Maju Mandlani was found lying dead at village Behra. The admitted position remains that Manju Mandalani was married with the acc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top