SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

T.RANGA RAO
P. Hanumantha Rao – Appellant
Versus
Kaki Venkata Rao – Respondent


JUDGMENT

T. Ranga Rao, J. - This revision is directed against the judgment dt. 31-1-1996 in C.C. No. 96/1993 on the file of the III Addl. Munsif Magistrate, Ongole.

2. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Naguluppalapadu Police Station filed charge sheet against the revision petitioner 1st respondent Kaki Venkatarao, who was working as Sub-Post Master, Naguluppalapadu Sub- Post Office, for the offences under Sections 409, 477-A and 463 IPC alleging that on 6-9-1989 the Asst. Superintendent of Post Officers inspected Sub-Post Office and found that the accused fabricated and falsified the accounts and misappropriated the amounts deposited by the customers.

3. On behalf of prosecution, 13 witnesses were examined as P. Ws 1 to 13 and marked Exs. P-1 to P-17. The defence of the petitioner is 1st respondent was of a total denial and none were examined on his behalf.

4. The learned Magistrate on considering the material on record found that there is material to show that the respondent is guilty of the offences U/secs. 409 and 477-A IPC, but as the prosecution failed to obtain sanction to prosecute the accused, as contemplated U/s. 197 Cr. P.C. hence, found him not guilty and acquitted.

5. Aggrie

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top