SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.L.ANAND
Brijesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


JUDGMENT

R.L. Anand. J. - By this judgment I dispose of two Criminal Appeals Nos. 409-S8 of 1996 titled Brijesh Kumar v, State of Haryana and 336-S8 of 1996 titled Saroj v. State of Haryana as both these appeals have arisen from the judgment dated 24th April. 1996 passed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge. Jagadhri who convicted appellant Smt. Saroj under Section 363 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 366-A of the Indian Penal Code. Smt. Saroj was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years and to pay a fine of Rs. 200/- under Section 363 read with Section 34, Indian Penal Code. In default of payment of fine she was directed to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for a period of three months. Under Section 366-A of the Indian Penal Code, she was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years and to pay a fine of Rs. 300/- and in default of payment of fine she was ordered to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for a period of three months. Both the substantive sentences of imprisonment were ordered to run concurrently. Brijesh appellant was directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top